New Delhi: The Supreme Court castigated the Centre for repeatedly filing appeals on identical questions of law despite being fined earlier for clogging the justice delivery system with frivolous cases. Ticking off the Centre for snail-paced efforts to streamline its litigation policy, a bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta recently used the government's reformist slogan of "ease of doing business" to make a sharp point.

"Under the garb of ease of doing business, judiciary is being asked to reform. The boot is really on the other leg.The couldn't-care-less and insouciant attitude of the Union government with regard to litigation has gone a little too far," the bench ruled. Pointing to the collateral damage the overcrowding of the judicial system caused other litigants, besides financial liabilities of the government, the court asked when the "Rip Van Winkleism" would end.

"We hope that someday, some sense, if not better sense, will prevail on the Union of India with regard to the formulation of a realistic and meaningful national litigation policy and what it calls ‘ease of doing business', which can, if faithfully implemented, benefit litigants across the country," the bench said.

On December 8 last year, the SC had dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the Centre. Unmindful, the Centre filed another batch of petitions in March involving the very same question of law on the same issue dealt with in December. It was dismissed with a cost of Rs 1 lakh on March 9. The SC told the Centre that it should not "unnecessarily burden the justice delivery system" and must shape up its litigation policy.

"Unfortunately, the Union government has learned no lesson," the bench of Justices Lokur and Gupta said on April 24 when it came across a third set of appeals on the same issue with an identical question of law. The bench said it had expected the Centre to take steps to withdraw all pending appeals from the SC registry once the question of law was settled by the December 8 order.